Market Opportunity & Problem Statement

Market Size & Opportunity

EhanLabs operates at the intersection of AI and Web3 - two of the fastest-growing industries in the world, creating unprecedented market opportunities.

Total Addressable Market (TAM)

By 2030, the combined AI-as-a-Service and Web3 Creator markets are expected to exceed $400 billion:

  • Web3 Creator Economy: $100 billion by 2028

  • AI-as-a-Service Market: $300 billion by 2030

  • Combined Market: $400 billion TAM

Target Segment: Decentralized AI Ownership Layer

EhanLabs targets the emerging Decentralized AI Ownership Layer - a segment positioned at the intersection of:

  • AI Market: The rapidly expanding artificial intelligence industry

  • Web3 Economy: Decentralized, blockchain-based economic systems

  • AI Ownership Models: New frameworks for proving and managing AI asset ownership

Market Penetration Opportunity: The Decentralized AI Ownership Layer represents approximately $40 billion at just 10% penetration of the total combined market.

Growth Drivers

This positioning positions EhanLabs for multi-billion dollar growth potential, driven by:

1

Verified AI Ownership

Blockchain-based proof of originality and ownership.

2

Smart Licensing

Automated royalty distribution and transparent licensing terms.

3

Recurring Marketplace Revenue

Sustainable transaction-based revenue model.

Market Positioning

EhanLabs uniquely occupies the central intersection of three converging markets:

  • AI Market capabilities meet Web3 monetization

  • Web3 Economy infrastructure enables AI ownership models

  • Decentralized AI Ownership creates new value proposition

Capturing just 1% of this combined market translates to a multi-billion dollar opportunity.


Critical Problems in the Current AI Economy

The AI content boom faces systemic challenges that hinder innovation, trust, and fair compensation for creators. Research data reveals the severity and scope of these issues.

1. Theft & Misappropriation of AI Content

AI prompts and content are frequently copied, redistributed, or monetized without credit or payment to creators, causing significant financial losses.

Research Evidence:

  • 76% increase in AI-generated content among students over a one-year period, with associated plagiarism concerns (Copyleaks, 2024)

  • 30% plagiarism rate in AI-generated academic content (ArtSmart AI, 2025)

  • 77% of Americans have encountered AI-generated content online without proper disclosure (All About Cookies)

  • Major entertainment lawsuits: Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. have filed lawsuits against AI firm Midjourney for unauthorized use of copyrighted characters (AP News, June 2025)

  • Industry leaders describe the current AI landscape as "shoplifting content" from creators (Axios, January 2025)

Impact: Creators lose billions in potential revenue annually due to unauthorized copying, redistribution, and monetization of their work without attribution or compensation.

2. Trust Deficit & Authenticity Crisis

Buyers struggle to verify AI asset originality, authenticity, or ownership, creating a fundamental trust barrier that hinders marketplace adoption.

Legal Ambiguity:

  • US Court Ruling (March 2025): The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that AI-generated art lacking human creator input cannot be copyrighted under US law (Reuters)

  • Copyright Revocation: The "Zarya of the Dawn" case saw the US Copyright Office revoke copyright protection for AI-generated artwork, affirming that only human-created works are eligible for copyright (Wikipedia)

Security & Fraud Concerns:

  • Deepfake incidents increased by 3,000% in 2023, with voice cloning becoming a prevalent attack vector (DeepStrike, 2025)

  • Industry warnings: Creative Artists Agency (CAA), Hollywood's top talent agency, warned that OpenAI's Sora AI video tool poses "significant risks to creator rights" (Reuters, October 2025)

Impact: Without verifiable proof of originality and ownership, buyers cannot trust the authenticity of AI assets, and creators cannot prove ownership of their work.

3. Centralized Control & Security Vulnerabilities

Existing centralized platforms charge high fees, lack transparent rights proof, and suffer from critical security vulnerabilities.

Security Breaches:

  • 84% of AI tools analyzed have experienced at least one data breach (CyberNews, 2025)

  • 51% faced credential theft incidents

  • 93% showed issues with SSL/TLS configurations

  • 91% had flaws in infrastructure management

  • 36% of breaches occurred in the past 30 days alone

Economic Issues:

  • High platform fees: Centralized marketplaces typically charge 20-30% per transaction

  • Opaque revenue distribution: Lack of transparent rights proof and fee structures

  • Vendor lock-in: Users dependent on single platforms with unilateral policy changes

Impact: Creators pay exorbitant fees while platforms control their content and revenues, with security vulnerabilities exposing sensitive creator data.

4. Unfair Compensation

Research indicates systemic issues with compensation for AI creators and workers using AI tools.

Compensation Research:

  • Studies reveal that workers utilizing AI tools in their work receive reduced compensation, with participants attributing this to a belief that such workers "deserve less credit" (arXiv, 2025)

Legislative Responses:

  • Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act introduced in US Congress, requiring companies to disclose use of copyrighted works in training AI models, highlighting the need for transparency and fair compensation (Wikipedia)

Impact: Creators face reduced compensation both from reduced credit for AI-assisted work and from lack of automated royalty systems for derivative works. Billions in creator revenue are lost due to unauthorized use and absence of provenance tracking.


Why Traditional Solutions Fail

Centralized platforms and traditional approaches cannot adequately address these fundamental problems:

1

No Immutable Proof

Centralized databases can be altered, hacked, or lost. They cannot provide cryptographically secure proof of originality or ownership.

2

Opaque Systems

Fee structures, royalty distribution, and rights management occur behind closed doors without transparency or auditability.

3

Single Points of Failure

Centralized platforms create vendor lock-in, platform risk, and security vulnerabilities.

4

Manual Verification

Human-based verification is slow, expensive, and prone to errors. It cannot scale to handle millions of AI assets.

5

No Automated Royalties

Traditional systems require manual payment processing, leading to delays, errors, and missed payments for creators.

6

Without blockchain-based proof of creation timestamp and ownership, legal disputes are difficult to resolve.

The Need for a Decentralized Solution

These challenges demand a fundamental shift from centralized to decentralized systems:

  • Blockchain-based ownership: Immutable, timestamped proof that cannot be disputed

  • Smart contract automation: Automated royalty distribution and licensing terms

  • AI-powered verification: Scalable, autonomous content verification and duplicate detection

  • Community governance: Transparent, community-driven decision-making

  • Zero-trust architecture: Cryptographic proof eliminates the need to trust intermediaries

EhanLabs addresses all these challenges through its fully on-chain, decentralized marketplace architecture combined with autonomous AI agents.


Next: See Section 3 - Solution

Last updated