Governance Model

EhanLabs implements a progressive decentralization model that transitions from hybrid governance to full DAO control, ensuring the platform evolves from centralized management to complete community control while maintaining stability and security.

Progressive Decentralization Philosophy

EhanLabs believes in progressive decentralization - a gradual transition from centralized control to full DAO governance. This approach:

  • Maintains Stability: Core team handles critical decisions during early growth

  • Builds Trust: Community involvement from day one creates ownership and alignment

  • Reduces Risk: Gradual transition prevents governance attacks and protocol failures

  • Ensures Quality: Professional management during critical growth phases

Governance Phases

1

Phase 1: Hybrid Governance (Q2 2026)

Control Distribution: 70% Core Team / 30% Community

Core Team Responsibilities:

  • Critical protocol upgrades and security patches

  • Platform operations and infrastructure management

  • Emergency response and incident handling

  • Strategic partnerships and business development

  • Smart contract audits and security reviews

Community Voting Rights:

  • Feature requests and product enhancements

  • Platform fee adjustments (with minimum thresholds)

  • Marketing initiatives and community programs

  • UI/UX improvements and user experience changes

  • Category additions and marketplace organization

Governance Mechanisms:

  • Community polls for feedback

  • Advisory board input

  • Public forums for discussion

  • Transparency reports and updates

Why This Phase:

  • Early stage requires rapid iteration and technical expertise

  • Security and stability are paramount during MVP launch

  • Community is still forming and learning platform

  • Token distribution is still concentrated

2

Phase 2: Balanced Governance (Q3 - Q4 2026)

Control Distribution: 50% Core Team / 50% Community

Core Team Responsibilities:

  • Protocol security and critical upgrades

  • Technical infrastructure management

  • Legal and regulatory compliance

  • Strategic partnerships (with community approval)

Community Voting Rights:

  • All previous rights expanded

  • Treasury allocation and spending decisions

  • Partnership approvals and strategic initiatives

  • Tokenomics adjustments (with safeguards)

  • Platform fee structure changes

  • Major feature development priorities

New Governance Features:

  • Formal Proposal System: Structured proposal submission process

  • Voting Platform: On-chain voting with $EHAN tokens

  • Discussion Periods: Mandatory discussion before voting (5-7 days)

  • Proposal Thresholds: Minimum stake required for proposal submission

Governance Process (overview):

  • Proposal submission (requires minimum $EHAN stake)

  • Community discussion period (5-7 days)

  • Core team review and recommendation

  • On-chain voting (weighted by staked $EHAN)

  • Implementation (if approved by majority)

Why This Phase:

  • Platform has proven stability and security

  • Community is mature and engaged

  • Token distribution is more decentralized

  • Governance mechanisms are tested and trusted

3

Phase 3: Full DAO (2026 Onwards)

Control Distribution: 30% Core Team / 70% Community → Eventual Full Community Control

Core Team Role:

  • Service Providers: Core team transitions to service providers

  • Technical Implementation: Execute community-approved proposals

  • Advisory Role: Provide expertise but no decision-making power

  • Operational Support: Maintain infrastructure and support

Community Full Control:

  • All major decisions require community approval

  • Treasury fully controlled by DAO

  • Protocol upgrades voted on by community

  • Strategic direction set by community

  • Platform fee adjustments community-controlled

Governance Mechanisms:

  • On-Chain Voting: All votes recorded on blockchain

  • Proposal System: Anyone can submit proposals (with stake)

  • Governance Committees: Elected committees for oversight

  • Treasury Management: Multi-sig treasury controlled by community

  • Transparency: All decisions and spending visible on-chain

Transition Criteria:

  • Token distribution sufficiently decentralized

  • Governance mechanisms proven and secure

  • Community engagement and participation high

  • Platform stability and security validated

  • Legal and regulatory framework established

Governance Process

Proposal Submission

Proposal Types:

  • Protocol Upgrades: Technical improvements to smart contracts

  • Feature Requests: New marketplace features or capabilities

  • Fee Adjustments: Changes to platform fee structure

  • Treasury Allocation: Spending proposals for DAO treasury

  • Partnership Approvals: Strategic partnerships and integrations

  • Governance Changes: Modifications to governance process itself

Submission Requirements:

  • Minimum Stake: Requires minimum $EHAN stake to submit (prevents spam)

  • Proposal Deposit: Deposit required (returned if proposal reaches voting stage)

  • Format: Structured proposal format with:

    • Title and description

    • Rationale and impact analysis

    • Implementation plan

    • Budget (if applicable)

    • Timeline

Proposal Review:

  • Community Discussion: 5-7 day discussion period

  • Feedback Incorporation: Proposer can update based on feedback

  • Core Team Assessment: Technical feasibility and risk assessment

  • Voting Decision: Proposal moves to voting if meets criteria

1

Proposal Submission Process

Proposal submission flow:

  • Proposal submission (requires minimum $EHAN stake)

  • Community discussion period (5-7 days)

  • Core team review and recommendation

  • On-chain voting (weighted by staked $EHAN)

  • Implementation (if approved)

Voting Mechanism

Voting System:

  • On-Chain Voting: All votes recorded on ICP blockchain

  • Weighted by Stake: Voting power = staked $EHAN amount

  • Transparency: All votes visible and auditable

  • Finality: Votes cannot be altered once cast

Voting Options:

  • For: Support the proposal

  • Against: Reject the proposal

  • Abstain: No position

Voting Requirements:

  • Quorum: Minimum participation required (e.g., 20% of staked tokens)

  • Majority: Simple majority (50%+1) for most proposals

  • Super Majority: 67%+ required for critical decisions (fee changes, tokenomics)

Voting Period: Typically 5-7 days

Proposal Execution

1

Implementation Process

  • Vote Completion: Voting period ends

  • Result Verification: Results verified on-chain

  • Approval Check: Proposal passes if meets thresholds

  • Implementation: Core team (or designated party) implements

  • Verification: Implementation verified and tested

  • Completion: Proposal marked complete on-chain

2

Rejection Handling

  • Proposal deposit returned if rejected

  • Feedback provided for proposal improvement

  • Proposer can resubmit with modifications

Governance Committees

Purpose: Provide specialized oversight and expertise for different areas

Potential Committees:

  • Security Committee: Protocol security and audits

  • Treasury Committee: Treasury management and allocation

  • Product Committee: Feature development and priorities

  • Partnership Committee: Strategic partnerships and integrations

  • Compliance Committee: Legal and regulatory compliance

Committee Structure:

  • Elected by community vote

  • Fixed terms (e.g., 6-12 months)

  • Regular reporting to community

  • Transparent decision-making

Governance Transparency

Public Information:

  • All proposals and votes visible on-chain

  • Treasury balance and spending tracked

  • Governance metrics and participation statistics

  • Core team decisions and rationale

  • Regular transparency reports

Communication Channels:

  • Governance forum for discussions

  • On-chain voting interface

  • Regular community calls

  • Written updates and announcements

  • Public documentation

Token Holder Rights

As $EHAN Token Holder:

  • Voting Rights: Vote on all governance proposals

  • Proposal Submission: Submit proposals (with stake)

  • Treasury Oversight: Review and vote on treasury spending

  • Transparency Access: Access to all governance data

  • Committee Participation: Eligible for governance committees

Staking Requirements:

  • Basic Voting: No minimum (but voting power = stake amount)

  • Proposal Submission: Minimum stake required (prevents spam)

  • Committee Eligibility: Higher stake requirements

Risk Management

Governance Attacks Prevention:

  • Minimum Thresholds: Prevent spam proposals

  • Quorum Requirements: Ensure meaningful participation

  • Super Majority: Critical decisions require higher approval

  • Voting Periods: Prevent last-minute manipulation

  • Stake Requirements: Align incentives with platform success

Transition Safeguards:

  • Gradual Phase-In: Phases implemented gradually

  • Testing Periods: Governance mechanisms tested before full launch

  • Emergency Powers: Core team retains emergency powers during transition

  • Reversibility: Governance changes can be reversed if issues arise

Governance Roadmap

  • Q3-Q4 2025: Hybrid governance with community feedback

  • Q1-Q2 2026: Balanced governance with formal proposal system

  • Q3-Q4 2026: Full DAO launch with complete community control

Last updated